Measured Depth

Measured Depth

Was I wrong to be bearish on US LNG?

Reassessing US LNG in light of the war in Iran

Amber McCullagh's avatar
Amber McCullagh
Mar 24, 2026
∙ Paid

A few readers reached out to me about enterprise subscriptions, which made me realize I hadn’t publicized this option enough. For $7,500 annually, anyone in your organization can get access — please send me an e-mail at amber@measureddepth.com if that’s of interest.

On February 28, US and Israeli forces launched surprise airstrikes on several sites in Iran, killing Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei among other Iranian officials. This attack, along with subsequent Iranian counterstrikes, destabilized the region’s production and especially shipping routes, with attendant impacts on global energy and agricultural markets.

The degree of disruption in global oil and LNG markets, and by extension North American gas markets, depends on when and how the crisis is resolved. But regardless of the ultimate resolution, I’m reevaluating my view that it’s a bad time to be contracting for US LNG. Being an analyst means not just building a forecast but also thinking about how solid its foundations are. I underestimated the likelihood of war in the Middle East; for both LNG-market and oil-market reasons, instability there increases the option value of US LNG.

What are the war’s impacts on LNG markets?

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Measured Depth to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Amber · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture